[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][vc_column_text responsive_align=”left”]Our members (i.e., you) are truly amazing. This year we received a extraordinary challenge pledge of $450,000 towards the purchase of the James F. Strange Center, but we had to “earn” this gift by completing two separate challenges:
First, we had to demonstrate that we were all behind ASOR���s many initiatives by securing 450 unique donors by June 30, 2019. When we received this challenge on February 1st, we had about 200 donors for the fiscal year, so we had to receive gifts from 250 new donors in just five months. A tall order; yet, our members came through (once again).
Second (and separate from the participation goal), we must raise $225,000 in new gifts and pledges for the building by December 31, 2019. To date, we have received gifts and pledges of $171,402 for this challenge���so we only need $53,598 more. Now that we’re completed the participation challenge (see below), we will focus on raising the last $53,500+ that we need to pay off the building debt and exceed our goal.
For now, we are thrilled to announce that we exceeded the participation portion of the challenge. As of July 2nd, we had 461 donors, and we are still waiting for the mail to arrive over the next week with gifts postmarked by June 30th. We set an all-time high for both dollars donated and for participation in Fiscal Year 2019, and we are so thankful for all of your support.[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][vc_line_chart style=”modern” x_values=”FY2011; FY2012; FY2013; FY2014; FY2015; FY2016; FY2017; FY2018; FY2019″ values=”%5B%7B%22title%22%3A%22Number%20of%20Donors%22%2C%22y_values%22%3A%22235%3B%20282%3B%20353%3B%20417%3B%20400%3B%20405%3B%20402%3B%20457%3B%20461%22%2C%22color%22%3A%22blue%22%7D%2C%7B%22title%22%3A%22Gifts%20and%20Private%20Grants%20(in%20%24000’s)%22%2C%22y_values%22%3A%22157%3B%20241%3B%20350%3B%20404%3B%20295%3B%20288%3B%20357%3B%20483%3B%201261%22%2C%22color%22%3A%22turquoise%22%7D%5D” title=”Donor Participation Since 2011″][mk_divider][vc_column_text responsive_align=”left”]
Why does high donor participation matter?
This large number of donors (more than 1 in 5 of our members) is something that distinguishes 17勛圖from all other learned societies. And it matters, as the high level of donor participation from our membership engages the attention of foundations and major donors outside 17勛圖and helps us attract gifts and support from them.
Your donations also enable 17勛圖to carry out our mission. Subscriptions and memberships only account for about a quarter of our annual budget, so we rely on grants and donations from our members and friends. Even modest gifts add up to create significant support for ASOR, Truly, every donor is important, and every gift is meaningful.
If you are one of the people who made a gift to 17勛圖in Fiscal Year 2019, thank you so much for your support. Indeed, because of the cost of relocating to our new home in Alexandria, VA, your support has never been more beneficial.
Please take this opportunity to check out everyone who contributed in FY2019 by clicking on our . We hope that you will also review the list of . If we made an error in listing your name on the Honor Roll, we ask that you kindly e-mail us so that we can correct the mistake.
If you would like to get a head start on joining the list of donors to 17勛圖for Fiscal Year 2020 (ends June 30, 2020) and help us reach the second part of our challenge pledge, please click on the ���Donate Now��� button below!
[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][mk_table]
OTHER WAYS TO DONATE
Donate By Phone
Donate By Mail
Make A Pledge
(Donate Later)
Call ASOR:
703-789-9229
ASOR
James F. Strange Center
209 Commerce Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Table of Contents for Journal of Cuneiform Studies泭71 (2019)
You can receive (and other ) through an Please e-mail泭the Membership office if you have any questions.
Pp. 3���9: “A Double Date Formula of the Old Akkadian King Manishtusu,” by Nashat Alkhafaji
This article provides a preliminary edition of an unprovenienced Old Akkadian tablet located in the Iraq Museum that must have originated in Umma or its environs. This account of equids is unique in that it is the first ���mu-iti��� type that carries a year name; this is also the first known such year name from the reign of Manishtusu, the third ruler of the Sargonic dynasty of the late third millennium BCE.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 11���34: “How to ���Institutionalize��� a Household in Ur III ��irsu/Laga禳: The Case of the House of Ur-DUN,” by Palmiro Notizia
Aside from the institutional households, a good number of ���private��� estates are known from Ur III sources. These private households were usually named after their owners (members of the royal entourage, the military or the local elite, merchants, cultic officials etc.), and controlled extensive resources, but were only rarely mentioned in the administrative documents from the provincial archives. One of the best-documented private estate is the one that belonged to a certain Ur-DUN. His estate was located in the ��irsu/Laga禳 province and played an important role in the raising of slaughter animals and wool production. The aim of the present paper is to describe the economic activities of the Ur-DUN household according to the available sources and to highlight how this private household interacted with the provincial economy and the crown/military sector.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 35���52: “On the Location of Irisa��rig Once Again,” by Maurizio Viano
The recovery of a few royal inscriptions at T贖l贖l al-Baqarat (Iraq) by the archaeological mission of the University of Torino has made it possible to propose the identification of the site with ancient Ke禳. The present contribution reexamines the location of Irisa��rig in light of its well-known textual connections with and physical proximity to Ke禳.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 53-76: “The Structure of Prices in the Ur III Economy: Cults and Prices at the Collapse of the Ur III State,” by Eric L. Cripps
The production of a barley surplus by the Ur III economy was vital for the operation of its commodity money system. The standardizing bi-monetary equivalence of a gur measure of barley and a shekel of silver stabilized commodity prices for the thirty-five years before the reign of Ibbi-Suen. In Ibbi-Suen���s early years, the collapse of the barley supply induced an excessive devaluation of the barley to silver ratio leading to a near hyperinflation in the prices of staple commodities and bovids required for cult and other purposes. This article analyzes the inflation in prices of animals and staples correlated with the precipitous fall in the barley to silver price ratio. Data is primarily from the Ur texts dated to the seventh year of Ibbi-Suen���s reign concerned with the purchase and delivery to state institutions of animals. Importantly, an analysis of these events demonstrated the central function of a barley surplus in the Ur III monetary system.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 77-83: “A Cylinder Seal with an Amorite Name from Tepe Musiyan, Deh Luran Plain,” by Mohsen Zeynivand
The archeology of the Deh Luran plain was documented by the work of Frank Hole and his associates in 1960s and 1970s. While these investigations were mostly dedicated to the study of the village periods, the presence of early state formations on the plain was also documented by their surface surveys. Tepe Farukhabad was an exception, but because it was only a small settlement in the third and second millennia BCE, the excavations there did not yield fruitful results for this period. Based on their systematic surface study of Tepe Musiyan, Wright and Neely argued that during the third and second millennia BCE, this settlement played a central role in this strategic plain due to its location on the route from Susa to Der (Badra in Iraq). Recently, our team again surveyed the Deh Luran Plain. Our visit to Musiyan provided us with a cylinder seal discovered by one of the locals. The inscription reveals the owner as a person with an Amorite name who may have been present in Musiyan sometime during the early centuries of the second millennium BCE, contemporary with the end of the ��ima禳ki period, which in Mesopotamia extends from late in the Third Dynasty of Ur until the early Old Babylonian period.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 85-109: “Unfinished Business: The Relief on the Hammurabi Louvre Stele Revisited,” by Tallay Ornan
A reexamination of the relief on the Hammurabi���s ���Law Code��� stele reveals that the type of beard worn by Hammurabi泭and ��ama禳 does not conform to the Old Babylonian beard type. Moreover, the linear workmanship of the lower part of the king���s beard suggests that the relief was never finished. Considering the troubled history of the stele���made and erected in Babylonia in the late fifties of the eighteenth century BCE and carried away to Susa in the mid twelfth century���it is proposed that the resculpting of the Stele was undertaken by ��utruk-Na廎後葦unte or his son Kutir-Na廎後葦unte upon the Elamite capture of the monument with the goal of making it their own. An attempt to clarify the circumstances and motivation of this reworking is offered in the article.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 111-120: “An Uprising at Karkar: A New Historical-Literary Text,” by Elyze Zomer
This paper offers a new edition of the Middle Babylonian bilingual fragment VS 17, 43 (VAT 1514) together with the duplicate lines found on the obverse of the Kassite period exercise tablet CBS 7884. The text is of historical-literary content and depicts an otherwise unknown uprising at Karkar. A first edition of the text is offered together with a brief introduction regarding its problematic historical setting.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 121-132: “Fate Strikes Back: New Evidence for the Identification of the Hittite Fate Deities and Its Implications for Hieroglyphic Writing in Anatolia,” by Willemijn Waal
In 2014, I proposed that the GUL-禳梗禳 deities may have to be identified with the Kuwa(n)禳梗禳 deities, a suggestion that has met with severe criticisms.泭Since now new evidence has come to light that confirms the equation of these deities, it seems opportune to re-address this debate, which also has important consequences for the use of hieroglyphic writing in Anatolia. In this article, I will present the new evidence, counter the critiques that have been given, and address the wider implications.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 133-152: “War in Anatolia in the Post-Hittite Period: The Anatolian Hieroglyphic Inscription of Topada Revised,” by Lorenzo d���Alfonso
This article presents a new transcription and translation of the TOPADA inscription. According to the new interpretation, the inscription narrates the events of a four-year-long war between a western coalition led by an unnamed Phrygian king and a coalition of post-Hittite rulers from south-central Anatolia, led by Great King Wasusarma. The careful study of paleography, scribal practice, script development, and literary aspects yields a dating of the inscription to the late tenth or early ninth century BCE. In view of the growing archaeological evidence for the central Anatolian Dark Ages, the new interpretation of the inscription has far-reaching implications for the overarching historical picture of the early first millennium BCE in Western Asia. It also provides the earliest attestation for the kingdom of Phrygia, and the sole occurrence of the toponym Phrygia and derivatives outside of the western Greco-Roman sources.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 153-157: “Another Exemplar of Esarhaddon���s Uruk B Cylinder (NBC 2511),” by Shana Zaia
The Yale Babylonian Collection contains a partial cylinder, NBC 2511, that preserves a hitherto泭unknown example of Esarhaddon���s Uruk B inscription. While this exemplar does not deviate in translation from those already published in RINAP 4, there are some orthographic variations. This article presents an edition of NBC 2511 with some comments regarding its differences from the published exemplars and its parallels with other Esarhaddon Uruk cylinders.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 159-180: “A禳禳ur and His Friends: A Statistical Analysis of Neo-Assyrian Texts,” by Tero Alstola, Shana Zaia, Aleksi Sahala, Heidi Jauhiainen, Saana Sv瓣rd, and Krister Lind矇n
Large digital datasets of cuneiform sources lend themselves to computational analysis that can complement泭and improve upon traditional philological work. The present article applies social network analysis to an electronic corpus of 1,532 texts to study the god A禳禳ur and his position in divine networks in the Neo-Assyrian period. Our results show that the performance of social network analysis can be improved by using a small window size and calculating tie strengths with pointwise mutual information. This allows us to study the co-occurrences of gods in semantic contexts. From a network perspective, A禳禳ur is not a very central god in our corpus despite his importance in Assyrian royal theology, but he rather joins the existing networks of gods without altering them.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 181���190: “An Early Ma禳禳artu-List from the Eanna Temple in Uruk,” by Reinhard Pirngruber
This article presents editions of two ma禳禳artu lists from the Eanna-temple in Uruk now housed in the Yale Babylonian Collection and in the Princeton Theological Seminary. Not only are NCBT 660 and PTS 2232 among the very few completely preserved examples of such lists, they also belong to the earliest known specimens of their genre, dating to the third (602/1 BCE) and first (604/3 BCE) year of Nebuchadnezzar II. These texts are valuable additions to the rather sparse dossier containing information on the Eanna cult during the formative phase of the Neo-Babylonian Empire; moreover, they are related to a text that concerns Nabonidus���s cultic reforms in the Eanna.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 191-207: “Critical Review,” by Pascal Attinger
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][vc_column_text]17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this issue. Once you have activated your member token, to access the the entire issue, including book reviews, on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1567019974102{margin-right: 5px !important;margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_wp_posts title=”BROWSE THE NEWS ARCHIVE” number=”4″][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496684008271{margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 30px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_column_text] [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Current as of 6/30/19. Please send edits and suggestions to 17勛圖(email; 703-789-9229).
to view the list of Fiscal Year 2019 Honorific and Memorial Gifts.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]
Benefactor ($20,000 and up)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Susan Ackerman
Arnold and Porter, LLC (in kind)
Stevan B. Dana
Lawrence T. Geraty
Sharon Herbert
Norma Kershaw
MacAllister Machinery
P. E. MacAllister[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Eric and Carol Meyers
Richard F. Natarian
Ann V. Sahlman
Thomas and Marilyn Schaub*
Wayne Russell Shepard
Carolyn Midkiff Strange
World Monuments Fund[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Patron ($10,000 – $19,999)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Sheldon and Debbie Fox[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Ronald D. Geraty
W. Mark Lanier Theological Library
Virginia Theological Seminary (in kind)[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Friend ($5,000 – $9,999)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Anonymous
Sheila T. Bishop
Sonya and Richard Coffman
Susan Laden[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis
Joe D. Seger
Andy and Amy Vaughn[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Sponsor ($1,000 – $4,999)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Jeffrey Blakely
James Bucko
P. M. Mich癡le Daviau
Ted Dodd and Lynn Swartz Dodd
Jane DeRose Evans
Seymour Gitin
Denise Gold
Timothy P. Harrison
Michael Hasel
Peyton R. Helm
David Hendin
Ann-Marie Knoblauch
Oystein LaBianca[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Carol Landes
Alex and Bridget MacAllister
Dale Manor
Daniel Mattson
Andrew Moelis
Christopher Morris
Barbara A. Porter
B. W. Ruffner
H. Katharine Sheeler
Abraham Sofaer and Marian Scheuer Sofaer
Charles W. Steinmetz
Carolyn Waldron
J. Edward and Keeley Wright[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Sustainer ($500 – $999)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Lisa Marilyn Ackerman
Mitchell Allen
William S. Andreas
Gary Arbino
The Boston Foundation
Theodore Burgh
Hanan Charaf
J羹rgen Friede
Joseph Greene
Alison Acker Gruseke
Albert Leonard[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Beth Alpert Nakhai
Heather Dana Davis Parker
Suzanne Richard
Thomas Schneider
Stuart Swiny
Jane Cahill West
Donald Whitcomb and Janet Johnson
F. Bryan Wilkins
K. Lawson Younger
Jeanine Young-Mason[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Supporter ($250 – $499)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Elie M. Abemayor
Richard Adair
Susan Alcock
Lamar Barden
Vivian Bull
Richard R. Burky
Douglas Clark
William W. Ellinger III
Geoff Emberling
Steve E. Falconer
Paul Fitzpatrick
Kristine S. Garroway
Paul Gaylo
Rachel Hallote
James W. Hardin
Alexander Joffe
James F. Joyner III
Melody Knowles[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Carroll Kobs
Thomas Levy
Vincent Mauer
Byron McCane
Heather McKee
Piotr Michalowski
John Poss
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Kay Schellhase
Harriet Seiler
Hershel Shanks
John R. Spencer
Matthew Luke Vincent
Jane C. Waldbaum
James L. Walker
Eric L. Welch
Susan Lintz Williams[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Contributor ($100 – $249)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Peggy Ackerman
Matthew J. Adams
Vernon Appleby
Randall C. Bailey
Mary Jane Barth
Dianne H. Benton
Andrea Berlin
Mildred Bilt
Elizabeth Bloch-Smith
Emily Miller Bonney
Oded Borowski
Karen Borstad
Roger Bove
Margaret Brandt
Thomas Brayshaw
Wilfred F. Bunge
Cynthia Ruth Burdge
Frances Cahill
Annemarie Carr
Christopher Carr
Scott Chesworth
Megan Cifarelli
Mark Chancey
W. Malcolm Clark
William Clark
Eric Cline
Margaret E. Cohen
R. Dennis Cole
Robert E. Cooley
Kevin Cooney
Randy Corbet
Sarah Costello
Sidnie White Crawford
Cheryl Davis
Gregorio del Olmo Lete
Ruth Denault
Elif Denel
Bert DeVries
Michaella Ryan Dial
Helen Dixon
Alison Down
Anne M. Dunn
Jennie Ebeling
Terry Wayne Eddinger
David J. Eidson
Michael Paul Ellingsen
Raymond Ewing
Brian Facemire
Marjorie Fisher
Debra Foran
David Fosse
Catherine P. Foster
Norma J. Franklin
James Fraser
Joe Furr
Steven J. Garfinkle
Robert Gauld
Barbara Geller
Susan Gidley
Barry M. Gittlen
Richard Cartier Godfrey
Morris Golik
Angela Goodwin
David Gordon
Arnold J. Gutierrez
Carl Guzzo
Robert Haak
Jacqueline Haynes
Jennifer Helbley
Ellen Herscher
Forbes Hirsch
Merilyn P. Hodgson
Shirlee Hoffman
Susan Tower Hollis
Janet Horowitz[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Stephen Huffman
Herbert B. Huffmon
David Ilan
Massimo Imperiali
Charles Ellwood Jones
Dylan Karges
Trudy Kawami
KDI Capital Partners
Taylor Kelley
Ruth E. Kent
Stephen Kimpel
Sonja M. Klonaris
Stephen Kraft
Manfred Krebernik
David Laird
Nancy Lapp
Frederick Lauritsen
Arthur Lewis
Bjorn F. and Beverly Lindgren
Gloria London
JoAnn Denny Long
Catherine Lorber
Meir Lubetski
Frank Maddox
Charles Marlin
Sheila E. McGinn
Charles Midkiff
William R. Millar
Robert D. Miller
Jenna Morton
Robert A. Mullins
David Norris
Renee O’Brien
John P. Oleson
Marek Olszewski
Randall O���Neill
Thomas R. Pickering
Timothy Potts
Daniel J. Pullen
Jennifer Ramsay
Barbara Rentenbach
Robert Leo Reynolds
Joseph D. Rivera
Thomas Roby
Bruce Romanic
Mitchell Rothman
Robert H. Saunders
Kennett D. Schath
Jennifer Schneider
William Schniedewind
Wolfhart Schubach
Ryland and Carol Scott
Lee R. Seeman
Nancy Serwint
Audrey Shaffer
HL Sheppard
Alan Simmons
Jill Small
Robert Wayne Smith
Ondrej Stehlik
Olin J. Storvick*
James Riley Strange
Janet A. Sullivan
Robert Troth
Herbert Unger
Manny Villafana
Joseph J. Weinstein
Richard E. Whitaker
Robert R. Wilson
Frederick Winter
Irene J. Winter
Randall Younker
Richard Zettler
Ziony Zevit
Frank Zindler[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]
Donor (up to $100)
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]ACE Services
Randy Akers
Susan Allen
Cynthia Allyn
Bjorn Anderson
Jakob Andersson
Nathanael J. Andrade
Austin Andrews
Susan Arter
Brenda Baker
Jose E. Balcells
Nerida Bates
Amanda Bauer
Dennis C. Baugh
Adam Bean
Mark Becker
Leigh-Ann Bedal
Mike BenAvi
Robert Bewley
Alan Bower
Scott Branting
Aaron Brody
Joel P. Butler MW
Mary Callaway
Dennis M. Callies
Mervyn Carson
Evan Carter
Christian Dane Casey
Roy Ciampa
Joseph Cigliano
Maureen Clawson
Betty Coffman
Carson Coffman
Stephen Cook
Aaron Coyle-Carr
Isabel Creasman
Pearce Paul Creasman
Marta D���Andrea
John Darst
Peter Davids
Caroline Davies
Anne McKinney Dehnisch
Paul J. Dirkes
Michel Disdero
Chonglinf Dong
Arthur Drott
Zachary Dunseth
Pinar Durgun
Tiffany Earley-Spadoni
Benjamin Eliason
Sigo Falk
Valerie Fargo
Heidi Fessler
Kevin Fisher
Daniel Fisher-Livne
Paul V. M. Flesher
Elise Friedland
Bryan Fox
Matthew Fox
Eugene M. Futato
Pamela Gaber
Aaron David Gidding
Nathan Gidding
Samuel Gidding
Kathryn Gleason
Shubadhra Gopalakrishnan
Claire Gottlieb
Marylinda Govaars
Samuel Greengus
Jonathan Greer
Paul Gregor
Kathryn Grossman
Reem Habayeb
Melvyn Halbert
Judith Hall
Elaine Handelman
Lowell K. Handy
Edward Hanlon
A. M. Hansen
Walt Harper
Michael Harrower
Rick Hauser
Elliot Heifetz
Daniel Henningsson
Peter Herdrich
Richard Hess
Karyn Hilliard
Kathleen Hollenbeck
Mara T. Horowitz
Marjorie Hoskinson
Jeffrey Hudon
Izaak J. de Hulster
Patricia Hung
Deborah Hurn
Susan Hussein
Institute for Archaeological Research & Discovery[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Walter Jacob
Margaret Lois Jansen
Stephen Jervey
Craig Jones
Lillian B. Joyce
Marshall Kaiser
Rachel Kalisher
Debra Kalodner
Jeffery Keefe
Aaron Koller
Paul Korchin
William Krieger
Katherine Larson
Joseph I. Lauer
Randall and Mary Nell Lee
Peter Machinist
David Maltsberger
Suzanne Malush
Faith Mason
Stanley Maxwell
Laura Mazow
James L. McClain
Martin McNamara
Dottie Middleton
James Moore
Melissa Muendel
Shakir Mustafa
Rachel Virginia Nabulsi
Nawal Nasrallah
David L. Nelson
Network for Good
David Nickols
Erika Marie Niemann
Christina Olson
Selma Omerefendic
Paul Orselli
Elizabeth A. Osinga
Marta Ostovich
Christine Elizabeth Palmer
Rosemary N. Palmer
Roy R. Palmer
Tate Paulette
Lawrence Pearl
Jane D. Peterson
Megan A. Perry
Stetson Pevear
Donald Charles Polaski
Sandra Hack Polaski
Taube Ponce
Bezalel Porten
Arlene Press
Robert E. Puscheck
Tine Rassalle
Paul Ray Jr.
William Raynolds
M. Barbara Reeves
Austin Richards
Sarah Richardson
Richard Rismiller
Chris Rollston
Lucille Roussin
Karen S. Rubinson
John Russell
Jeremy B. Rutter
Richard Sarason
Bettina Schwarz-Seibert
Mark Schuler
Stephanie Selover
Sarah Stowell Shapley
China Shelton
Sara Shelton
R. Mark Shipp
Felicia Silcox
Michael Simone
Mali Annika Skotheim
Donald Charles Smith
Betty Snow
Bruno Soltic
Cale Staley
Donna Suloff
Nancy Surdoval
Theodore Swanson
Juan Manuel Tebes
Allison Karmel Thomason
Megan Thomsen
Gordon Tucker
Craig Tyson
Armando Vargas
Monique Vincent
Daniel Warner
Martha Weber
James M. Weinstein
Lynn Welton
Ronn Woolley
Jane Zimmerman
Michael S. Zimmerman[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]*Deceased[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496377378685{margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 30px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_wp_posts title=”BROWSE THE NEWS ARCHIVE” number=”4″][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496375380556{margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 30px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_column_text] [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Table of Contents for Near Eastern Archaeology 82.2 (June 2019)
You can receive (and other ) through an . Please e-mail泭the Membership office if you have any questions.
Pp. 67-74: “The Mainstream Media and the ‘Shocking Bad Art’ from Cyprus: 1870s New York Reacts to the Cesnola Collections,” by Ann-Marie Knoblauch
When the Metropolitan Museum of Art first opened the doors of its Fifth Avenue building on March 30, 1880, the majority of the exhibition space was occupied by Cypriot art purchased by the Met���s trustees from Luigi Palma di Cesnola in two lots, one in 1872 and another in 1876. The two collections amounted to around twenty thousand objects, all finds Cesnola had acquired while serving as US Consul on the island from 1865���1876. After the acquisition of the second collection, Cesnola left Cyprus to become the first director of the Metropolitan Museum, a position he held until his death in 1904. New Yorkers in the 1870s were most intriguing by the works of limestone sculptures from the sanctuary at Golgoi. In the 1880s these objects would become embroiled in a scandal because of the claim that Cesnola had performed intentionally misleading restorations, but before that disgrace and through much of the 1870s, New Yorkers were processing the arrival of an enormous volume of ancient Cypriot objects in a relatively short amount of time.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 75-81: “Imagining Henenu,” by Carlos Gracia Zamacona
The Middle Kingdom Theban Project, begun in 2014 under the auspices of the Freie Universit瓣t Berlin, represents the resumption of the archaeological activities in the Middle Kingdom necropolis of Deir el-Bahari and Asasif. The site had previously been excavated under the auspices of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, initiated by Herbert Eustis Winlock in 1912 with survey activities followed by excavations from 1921���1922 until 1928 (Arnold 1996: 59). Winlock���s excavations had been preceded by Howard Carter���s in 1910���1911 (Morales et al. 2016: 258). The current excavations began in 2015, and have continued annually through 2018 (Morales et al. 2016, 2017, and 2018) under the auspices of the Universidad de Alcal獺 (Madrid, Spain), with a fifth season scheduled for October 2019.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 82-88: “Two Punic Stelae Rediscovered in Philadelphia,” by Jean MacIntosh Turfa
In the University of Pennsylvania Museum, Philadelphia, two small, fragmentary Punic stelae were found in storage by Asian Section Keeper Stephen Lang.1 They were remnants from a large donation, made over a century ago, of part of the variegated collection of Maxwell Sommerville, perhaps best known for engraved gems of all kinds, and also much Asian material. Sommerville (1829���1904) was an affluent Philadelphia businessman who devoted his later life (and funds) to world travel and the collection of antiquities in Europe, Turkey, Syria, Egypt, and North Africa as well as China, Japan, India, Burma, and Thailand. He published memoirs of his travels and catalogues and discussions of the gems and seals. His collection, originally exhibited in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (1888���1891), was placed in the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania (1891) and remained there upon his bequest (see Berges 2002: 11���19). Although Sommerville���s memoir Sands of Sahara (1901) describes some of his North African travels, there is no reference to his acquisition of the Punic artifacts.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 90-101: “A New Jewelry Hoard from Eleventh-Century BCE Megiddo,” by Eran Arie, Elisabetta Boaretto, Mario A. S. Martin, Dvory Namdar, Orit Shamir, and Naama Yahalom-Mack
A magnificent new jewelry hoard was uncovered on July 11, 2010 in Area H of the northwestern sector of Tel Megiddo. This site in the Jezreel Valley (Israel) is one of the most important in the southern Levant thanks to four archaeological expeditions that have thoroughly excavated the mound and rapidly published the results of their digs (Ussishkin 2018). All expeditions unearthed hoards of different types from the Late Bronze and Iron Ages (Hall 2016). This new hoard was unearthed in a destruction debris, securely dated to the Early Iron Age I, ca. 1070 BCE (local Level H-11, which equals University of Chicago���s Stratum VIIA). During this period, part of a building (remnants of two rooms and an inner courtyard surrounded by three large open courtyards) was found in this area (figs. 1���2; Finkelstein et al. 2017: 267���69). The building is positioned only about 30 m from Canaanite Palace 2041 of the city of Stratum VIIA. This article offers a preliminary publication of the hoard; a full report will soon be published in the Megiddo VI volume (Arie forthcoming a).
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 102-113: “Identifying a Dionysian Community in Ashkelon���s Eastern Cemetery,” by Davida Eisenberg-Degen, Ilan Peretz, and Eriola Jakoel
Ashkelon���s Eastern Cemetery was in continuous use for more than half a millennium, from the Hellenistic through Late Byzantine periods (fig. 1). Several excavations carried out in Ashkelon���s Eastern Cemetery reveal simple hewn graves alongside burial structures (Eisenberg-Degen 2017; Peretz 2017 and references listed there). Grave goods were found in several burials dating to the Roman period. Depositing funerary offerings was a common practice in the Roman era. Roughly a third of the excavated Eastern Cemetery (fig. 2, n=24) contained grave goods (Eisenberg-Degen 2017). Taking into account that some pilfering and plundering most likely took place, this figure is consistent with percentages noted in other Roman-period burials (Findlater et al. 2013: 69���80; Winter 2015: 82���87).
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 114-123: “Joseph���s Tomb: A Model of Traditional Islamic Shrines in Palestine,” by Loay Abu Alsaud and Amer Al-Qobbaj
Joseph���s Shrine is located on the outskirts of the eastern side of the city of Nablus (fig. 1), near Tell Balatah, the site of the Canaanite City of Shechem, and 300 m northwest of Jacob���s Well (Pummer 1993: 139; Bruce 1994: 102). Joseph���s tomb has been venerated throughout the ages by Samaritans (for whom it is the second-holiest site), Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The total area of Joseph���s Shrine is 661 m簡 and it is located in Block 5, parcel 10, according to early Islamic Immovable Property Records from the Department of Al Awqaf Al Islamyah (Jordanian Islamic Endowments), Nablus (fig. 2). Originally situated on an agricultural plain, it is now surrounded by buildings, due to expansion of housing and schools in central Balata.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][vc_column_text]17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this issue. Once you have activated your member token, to access the the entire issue, including book reviews, on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496684098866{margin-right: 5px !important;margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_wp_posts title=”BROWSE THE NEWS ARCHIVE” number=”4″][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496684008271{margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 30px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_column_text] [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Table of Contents for Bulletin of ASOR泭381 (May 2019)
You can receive (and other ) through an . Please e-mail泭the Membership office if you have any questions.
Pp. 1���19: “The Terra-cotta Figurines from a Lamp Workshop at Khirbat Shumeila near Beit Nattif, Israel,” by Benyamin Storchan and泭Achim Lichtenberger
In 1934, excavations conducted at Beit Nattif, in the Judaean Shephelah region, uncovered a rich assemblage of waste from a terra-cotta lamp and figurine workshop. The items produced at the workshop, which are now known by the name of the site, are dated to around 300 c.e. and can be considered a hallmark of the regional material culture of the Late Roman period, a time of wideranging cultural influences. Recent excavations at Khirbat Shumeila, located in the immediate Beit Nattif region, have uncovered the remains of a Beit Nattif lamp workshop. The Khirbat Shumeila workshop can be dated to the late 4th century c.e. During the excavations, a number of typical Beit Nattif figurines and a figurine mold were uncovered, providing an opportunity to analyze the stylistic and morphological development of the figurines over 100 years. While the new workshop was focused primarily on lamp production, figurine production existed as a secondary industry, further implying the existence of multiple parallel workshops in the region.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 21-40: “Correlated Change: Comparing Modifications to Ceramic Assemblages from Qizlar Qal尨eh, Iran, and Ancient Merv, Turkmenistan, during the Seleucid and Parthian Periods,” by Gabriele Puschnigg, Maria Daghmehchi, and Jebrael Nokandeh
From the Seleucid period onward, substantial transformations occurred in the ceramic assemblages from Qizlar Qal尨eh on the Gorgan Plain and ancient Merv (modern Gyaur Kala). Using quantitative and archaeometric analyses, we assess and compare modifications in vessel repertoires, production techniques, and material sources across both sites to understand the nature and chronology of these changes. Similar technological developments are observed at Qizlar Qal尨eh and Merv, and are examined with regard to a potential Hellenistic reception in the ceramic material. Variations in the chronological distribution of innovations and assemblage composition help us to elucidate the neighborhood relations between eastern Iran and western Central Asia at this time. Our comparisons point toward a common cultural environment for both sites especially during the Early Parthian period, which is demonstrated in the many analogies of manufacturing techniques and vessel shapes. At the same time, we see different continuing local traditions, highlighting the flexible mode in which ceramic repertoires are adapted to the changing requirements under Hellenistic rule.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 41-56: “Four Judean Bullae from the 2014 Season at Tel Lachish,” by Martin G. Klingbeil, Michael G. Hasel, Yosef Garfinkel, and N矇stor H. Petruk
The article presents four decorated epigraphic bullae unearthed in the Level III destruction at Lachish during the 2014 season, focusing on the epigraphic, iconographic, and historical aspects of the seal impressions.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 57-81: “Uninscribed Amethyst Scarabs from the Southern Levant,” by Arlette David
Prompted by the discovery of a schematic uninscribed amethyst scarab at Tel Abel Beth Maacah in the Upper Galilee, an overview of such scarabs found in the southern Levant is provided, with a typological analysis and a tentative dating and origin of these pieces.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 83-105: “Foreign Food Plants as Prestigious Gifts: The Archaeobotany of the Amarna Age Palace at Tel Beth-Shemesh, Israel,” Ehud Weiss, Yael Mahler-Slasky, Yoel Melamed, Zvi Lederman, Shlomo Bunimovitz, Shawn Bubel, and Dale Manor
In contrast with the relatively rich documentation from the el-Amarna archive related to the main city-states of the southern Levant in the Amarna Age (Late Bronze Age IIA; 14th century b.c.e.), archaeological data from these sites is still wanting. This unfortunate situation highlights the importance of the ca. 60,000-item plant collection from the recently exposed Late Bronze Age IIA palace at Tel Beth-Shemesh. Room L1505 in the palace���apparently a pantry due to its contents of foodstuffs and vessels for food preparation and consumption���contained eight deposits of carbonized crop plants. Deposits of almost pure grains and very low numbers of weed seeds were found, indicating that these stored food plants were ready to be used in food preparation. Of special interest is the presence of a sizeable amount of two rare pulses in Levantine archaeobotany���fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) and Cyprus vetch (Lathyrus ochrus)���only found in two other Bronze Age royal contexts: Tutankhamun���s tomb in Egypt and the Late Minoan II Unexplored Mansion in Knossos. Thus, in addition to attesting to the agricultural practices and culinary preferences of a Canaanite ruling court during the Amarna Age, this botanical assemblage also hints at prestigious royal gift exchanges of exotic food plants.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 107-144: “Tel Yaqush���An Early Bronze Age Village in the Central Jordan Valley, Israel,” by Yael Rotem, Mark Iserlis, Felix H繹flmayer, and Yorke M. Rowan
This article highlights the results of five excavation seasons at Tel Yaqush, Israel, conducted between the 1989 and 2000 on behalf of The Oriental Institute at The University of Chicago. Tel Yaqush was a medium-sized village, inhabited during the entire Early Bronze Age period, from the mid-4th to the mid-3rd millennia b.c.e. The excavations exposed a dense settlement begun in the Early Bronze Age (EB) I, which ended in a severe conflagration. Apparently rebuilt at the beginning of EB II, the village remained a small site and technically non-urban throughout the period. Destroyed at the end of EB II, it was renewed in EB III, coinciding with the arrival of people bearing the Khirbet Kerak Ware ceramic tradition. This preliminary report includes new observations following recent studies of Tel Yaqush finds, including a new sequence of 14C dates from EB I to III (published in detail elsewhere). The excavation results summarized here reveal the unique role Tel Yaqush played during the shift to urbanism, and its contribution to our understanding of Early Bronze Age village society in the central Jordan Valley.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 145-162: “‘Crossing the Lines’���Elaborately Decorated Chalcolithic Basalt Bowls in the Southern Levant,” by Rivka Chasan, Edwin C. M. van den Brink, and Danny Rosenberg
The Late Chalcolithic period in the southern Levant shows a marked increase in symbolic expression. While most Late Chalcolithic basalt bowls are undecorated, notable amounts of these were adorned, and their decorations typically conform to a few canonized conventions. A small amount of the decorated Late Chalcolithic basalt bowls are further incised with unconventional, unique designs on their exteriors. These elaborately decorated basalt bowls stand in sharp contrast to the conventionally decorated ones, thus signifying their different roles. This article discusses their geographic distributions, frequencies, and characteristics, and offers further suggestions as to their position within the Late Chalcolithic symbolic and prestige item systems. The analysis reveals regional patterns���the elaborately decorated basalt bowls are constrained to south of the Yarkon River���suggesting that the function and symbolic value of these bowls were probably geographically restricted. Their limited distribution underlines the exclusivity of these elaborately decorated bowls during the Late Chalcolithic period.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 163-191: “Canaanite Re廎叨b: Tel Re廎叨v in the Late Bronze Age,” by Amihai Mazar, Uri Davidovich, and with an Appendix by Arlette David
Tel Re廎叨v, identified with Re廎叨b, was one of the largest Canaanite cities in the southern Levant during the Late Bronze Age (15th���13th centuries b.c.e.). Unlike many other Canaanite settlements, the city was founded in the 15th century after a hiatus beginning in Early Bronze Age III. In this article, four major Late Bronze Age occupation strata are described. Notable is a monumental structure dated to the 14th century b.c.e. with unusual architectural features that could be either the residence of a high-ranking family or an administrative building. During the 13th century b.c.e., this building was replaced by a new structure containing a metalsmith���s workshop, inspired by Egyptian 19th Dynasty techniques, while later building phases belong to the final stages of the Late Bronze Age. No destruction layers were found, and the Late Bronze Age city was rebuilt and continued to thrive throughout the Iron Age I. Five Late Bronze Age plaque figurines, some of particular interest, are also described. An appendix discusses a rare funerary scarab of an Egyptian high official found in the 14th-century b.c.e. edifice.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 193-202: “Abracadabra, or ‘I Create as I Speak’: A Reanalysis of the First Verb in the Katumuwa Inscription in Light of Northwest Semitic and Hieroglyphic Luwian Parallels,” by Timothy Hogue
Previous translations of the Katumuwa Inscription have either rendered the first verbal phrase (qnt ly) ���I commissioned for myself,��� or ���I acquired for myself.��� No scholars have yet defended the possibility that it simply means ���I made.��� In fact, this is likely the case given the typical monumental rhetoric of Northwest Semitic and Hieroglyphic Luwian monumental inscriptions. In particular, a comparison with verbs of monumenting in Hieroglyphic Luwian inscriptions suggests that the monumenting phrase in the Katumuwa Inscription was calqued on a Luwian phrase. This difference is significant because it reveals an important aspect of the inscription���s monumentality and the Syro-Anatolian conception of the stele. The stele that Katumuwa created was not understood merely as the inscribed object. Rather, the monument was the conjunction of material object, ritual engagement, and the resultant manifestation of the monument���s commissioner. There was no monument apart from Katumuwa, whose voice was preserved in the inscription and whose presence could be reactivated through ritual. Therefore, Katumuwa did in fact ���create��� the stele as he spoke through it to his monument���s users.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 203-210: “An Inscribed Sherd in Aramaic Script from Barikot, Pakistan,” by Michael Zellmann-Rohrer and Luca Maria Olivieri
This article discusses a sherd inscribed with a text in Aramaic script from Barikot in Pakistan. The site, known in classical sources on Alexander the Great, has been regularly investigated over the last 40 years. In recent excavation campaigns, new evidence of the earliest phases of the city (500���50 b.c.e.) has been discovered, including the sherd treated here, among other inscribed pottery in Greek and Br��hm蘋.
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
Pp. 211-236: “An Eighth-Century b.c.e. Gate Shrine at Tel Lachish, Israel,” by Saar Ganor and Igor Kreimerman
Excavations conducted on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority at Tel Lachish exposed the southern half of the six-chambered gate in Level III. In the eastern chamber, a gate shrine was uncovered. The shrine was split in two: a larger northern room and a smaller southern room. The southern room, which served as the holy of holies, had a niche in its southern wall in front of which a double altar was placed. Dozens of bowls and oil lamps were revealed inside the shrine. At some point, evidently prior to the destruction of Level III by Sennacherib in 701 b.c.e., the shrine was desecrated and sealed. This act was evident in the breakage of the altar���s horns and the placement of a latrine in the holy of holies. The available data suggests that the desecration of the shrine should be associated with Hezekiah���s cultic reform (2 Kgs 18:4).
17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this article. Once you have activated your member token, to access the above article on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.
[/vc_column_text][mk_divider][vc_column_text]17勛圖Members with online access: navigate to the token link email sent to you before attempting to read this issue. Once you have activated your member token, to access the the entire issue, including book reviews, on The University of Chicago Press Journals’ website.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496684098866{margin-right: 5px !important;margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_wp_posts title=”BROWSE THE NEWS ARCHIVE” number=”4″][/vc_column][vc_column border_color=”rgba(170,170,170,0.01)” width=”1/6″ css=”.vc_custom_1496684008271{margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 30px !important;border-right-width: 2px !important;border-bottom-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 30px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;border-right-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;border-bottom-color: rgba(227,228,228,0.75) !important;}”][vc_column_text] [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
There are hundreds of thousands of examples of rock art in the Sahara, dating from the present back to over 10,000 years ago. But with access currently difficult thanks to unrest, digital archives offer new opportunities. [/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_column_text]
By Caroline Tully
Every society has symbols of leadership, and in a surprising number of Mediterranean and Near Eastern societies these are trees. A look at tiny examples of Aegean art gives some hints why. [/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_column_text]
By Vanessa Davies
Peace is a common aspiration. But what does the Egyptian version of a peace treaty with the Hittites tell us about their conception of peace? What did they really mean by ���peace���? [/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_column_text]
By Amy L. Balogh
Prophet. Lawgiver. Deliverer. Judge. None of the terms used to describe Moses fully describe his status. But what if we look outside of the Bible for other ancient Near Eastern terms? [/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is the preeminent society for individuals interested in the archaeology of the eastern Mediterranean and the Biblical Lands. This blog is intended to facilitate ASOR���s泭mission泭���to initiate, encourage and support research into, and public understanding of, the cultures and history of the Near East from the earliest times.���[/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]
Digging the Iron Age at Bethsaida
By: Olga Goussev-Sushinsky, 2013 Heritage Fellow
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_single_image image=”48696″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center” css=”.vc_custom_1558038202193{padding-right: 10px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]For my first archaeological dig, I decided to choose Bethsaida. 泭The site is located at north-east shore of the Sea of Galilee and is most known for its role in the New Testament. It is also renowned for being the capital of the Biblical kingdom Geshur. 泭Led by Dr. Rami Arav of the University of Nebraska, the project focuses on strata ranging from the Iron I to the Early Roman period. I learned about the Bethsaida Excavations Project during the last 17勛圖Annual Meeting and became immediately drawn to the idea of excavating the legendary city of Geshur.
This year, our team was working on three areas, the Iron Age area, the Greco-Roman area, and the new one, whose age is still being determined. Each volunteer was presented with a choice of a preferable area, and I chose the one dating to the Iron Age (Area A<strong> ���</strong>south). The goal of our group was to expose a paved plaza floor of an Iron Age city and to find the outer defense wall. 泭I mostly dug the floor, while others worked in a trench area located behind the wall and on a mound next to the pavement. At some point, we came across some disturbances from modern activity. We found a few modern artifacts, including modern ware shards and a phone wire. After working through the disturbed area, our team discovered the destruction of the city gate���the infrastructure to the paved plaza���dating to the 9th century BCE. Below the pavement is located the floor of the earlier city gate dating to the 10th century BCE.
Most of the site activities involved digging, carrying heavy buckets of dirt, and desperately trying to find treasures through sifting. Being a first-time volunteer for an archaeological project, I have to admit that I had unrealistic expectations of findings. I expected to find hordes of coins, well-preserved pottery, and perhaps a scarab seal or two. Obviously, I am exaggerating. ���� 泭With time, I began to realize that every single find, no matter how big or small, is incredibly exciting. Needless to say, I did end up finding some interesting artifacts.
Most of our findings consisted of mixed pottery assemblage from different ages, flint tools, and occasional bones. 泭The most exciting day of my stay was the day I found a piece of a shard of an elaborate Roman pot imported from Carthage. On the same day, a volunteer from an adjacent area also discovered a beautiful Phoenician bead from 2nd century BCE. I was equally excited for both of us!
Thanks to the Heritage Fellowship and to Rami Arav, the director of the dig, I had an amazing time at Bethsaida. 泭Not only did I gain insight into archaeology, I was also honored to meet many professionals from the field of Near Eastern Civilizations and to present a paper at one of the evening lectures held at our kibbutz.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog or found by following any link on this blog. 17勛圖will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information. 17勛圖will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. The opinions expressed by Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of 17勛圖or any employee thereof.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is the preeminent society for individuals interested in the archaeology of the eastern Mediterranean and the Biblical Lands. This blog is intended to facilitate ASOR���s泭mission泭���to initiate, encourage and support research into, and public understanding of, the cultures and history of the Near East from the earliest times.���[/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]
The Dilemma of Denial: Scholarly Publication Policies and the Illusion of Power
By: Jonathan Rosenbaum
President Emeritus, Gratz College
For generations, academic journals have been deemed the appropriate venue for the initial publication of ancient inscriptions and artifacts. Nevertheless, last fall, the New York Times became the source of an editio princeps when it announced the discovery of a ���faded papyrus fragment��� that seemed to be ���.��� The Times reporter had not gained access to the fragment through a dogged effort of investigative journalism or a lucky find on the black market. Rather, Karen L. King, a prolific scholar of early Christianity at the Harvard Divinity School (HDS), had shared the discovery in an interview with the Times, the Boston Globe, andHarvard Magazine. Prof. King provocatively described the fragment as the ���Gospel of Jesus���s Wife.���
Popular media immediately presented a panoply of opinions by respected papyrologists, Coptic linguists, Christian theologians, and laypeople. The Vatican weighed in with both an editorial and an article in L���Osservatore Romano, and the latter by Coptic scholar, Alberto Camplani, expressing a more guarded opinion based upon the lack of provenance.
Prof. King moved forward. She continued her work with a series of specialists who undertook the examination of the fragment using techniques ranging from linguistics and paleography to chemical analysis. The circumstances of the papyrus���s discovery are unknown and the earliest academic awareness of the fragment dates to 1982. Nevertheless, on the basis of initial analyses, Prof. King preliminarily concluded that the and posited its initial composition in the second half of the second century.
Shortly before giving her interview, Prof. King had submitted an article on the fragment to the Harvard Theological Review (HTR) whose own reviewers provided important observations and whose editors accepted her article subject to the conclusion of various chemical analyses. In January 2013, HTR announced that the until those tests were complete. 泭In the interim, Prof. King has published the on the HDS website.
The Coptic fragment controversy stands in stark contrast to an established scholarly norm. In 1970, designed to discourage illicit import, export, and transfer of ownership of cultural property including illicit or forged antiquities and items of cultural patrimony. The (AIA) and the (ICOM) adopted similar resolutions in 1973 and 1974. 泭Some governments and followed. 泭ASOR���s publication policy states: ���17勛圖members should not participate, directly or indirectly, in the buying and selling of artifacts illegally excavated or exported from the country of origin after 1970.��� Further, ���.���
These well-intentioned policies seek to discourage looting, forgery, and financial gain from such objects by denying the prestige and concomitant rise in value that scholarly publications bestow. Scholarly societies understandably presume that their most potent deterrent is their refusal to publish inscriptions or artifacts lacking provenience (archaeological location) and provenance (chain of custody after the modern rediscovery). Using the date of UNESCO���s 1970 policy as a terminus, they exclude materials not found in situ after that date. 泭However, a large loophole exists in this policy. The prohibition does not apply once an unprovenanced object has been published elsewhere. 泭Thus, preventative measures can be circumvented simply by first publishing in a journal that does not reject unprovenanced objects.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_single_image image=”48554″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” css=”.vc_custom_1557170043481{padding-right: 10px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]While the intent of this policy is laudable, such a blanket procedure excludes authentic antiquities that can inform history. The Dead Sea Scrolls were first discovered by chance in 1947. 泭Seven of them, some complete, came into the hands of antiquities dealers who offered them to scholars. Hebrew University Professor E. L. Sukenik not only recognized their antiquity but succeeded in acquiring three of the scrolls. Subsequently, the Israeli government acquired the other four. 泭In the 1950s under the leadership of the Biblical scholar Father Roland DeVaux, scholars began to excavate the cave where the first scrolls were found as well as the 40 other caves near Qumran. Eleven of these caves yielded scrolls and tens of thousands of fragments were discovered. Even some of these materials were eventually made available through dealers of antiquities and had to be purchased by scholars.
Were the procedures and policies of UNESCO, ICOM, AIA, and 17勛圖universally in place in all scholarly journals at the time of the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, many of them would not have seen the light of academic publication due to the circumstances by which they were acquired from antiquities dealers. Not all journals follow these strictures including Israel Exploration Journal, Journal of Biblical Literature, and Biblica. These journals have carefully conceived standards, but they are not as legalistic as BASOR���s.
Like other archaeological associations, 17勛圖has striven to address this dilemma. Through committees and standing sessions on cultural heritage, site preservation, and the ethics of research, scholars have discussed and debated these issues. The 2013 17勛圖Annual Meeting includes a session on ���Ethical Case Studies for Objects of Unknown Origin.��� The organizers of this session originally sought to solicit ���proposals based on studies in which objects of unknown origin are essential to the success of the research.��� However, due to the 17勛圖Policy on the Preservation and Protection of Archaeological Resources, the organizers agreed to omit a direct call to concentrate on such objects.
Clearly, the issue has reached a tipping point. Denial of publication lacks efficacy. Scholars like Prof. King are bringing potentially important finds into the scholarly arena, undeterred by such protocols. Prof. King is no rebel. As Hollis Professor of Divinity, she is the occupant of the oldest endowed chair in the United States.
The Coptic papyrus she studies illustrates key problems:
The Forgery Conundrum. Though the exhaustive analyses of the fragment suggests that the Coptic papyrus is not a forgery, the meticulous examinations that Prof. King and her colleagues have undertaken acknowledge the sophistication that contemporary forgers have reached and the concomitant need to use all available science to confirm or eliminate the possibility of a counterfeit.
The Unintended Consequences of Publication. Scholarly publication can enhance the value of illicit finds and thus encourage looting and forging.
The Dilemma of Denial. By refusing publication to artifacts lacking provenance, potentially revolutionary finds are denied the rigorous trial that scholarly debate provides. Historians are thus deprived of the opportunity to incorporate such finds, if deemed authentic by scholarly consensus, into the historical record.
Changes in the policy of non-publication of artifacts without provenience or provenance must come, but with conditions. In particular, those who seek publication must register the artifacts in an accessible database. Data on each artifact placed in the database would minimally include:
all available information concerning the provenance of the item including transcriptions of remarks by finders, owners, sellers, and dealers as well as scholars who have previously examined the artifact;
photographs of each artifact or epigraph according to established technical specifications;
a precise description and preliminary dating of the artifact according to established typologies and methods; and
permission to conduct laboratory analyses designed to root out forgery
Such a quid pro quo would facilitate research, encourage scholarly debate, and hopefully begin the process of eliminating the scourge of forged inscriptions that threatens to undermine history itself.
Strengthening the power of scholarly publication is but a first step. A more comprehensive solution to these vexing issues is critical. Without effective action, the world���s heritage will fall prey to cultural poachers and the primary witnesses of the past will continue to disappear with every passing day.
Jonathan Rosenbaum is a visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania and president emeritus of Gratz College. He taught previously at the University of Hartford and the University of Nebraska at Omaha.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog or found by following any link on this blog. 17勛圖will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information. 17勛圖will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. The opinions expressed by Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of 17勛圖or any employee thereof.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is the preeminent society for individuals interested in the archaeology of the eastern Mediterranean and the Biblical Lands. This blog is intended to facilitate ASOR���s泭mission泭���to initiate, encourage and support research into, and public understanding of, the cultures and history of the Near East from the earliest times.���[/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]
That���s a Wrap
This month we focused on archaeology in the Digital Age, featuring seven posts on new issues arising in the field such as open access in academic publishing and incorporating new technology into fieldwork and research. Check out the articles below and let us know what you think in the comments. Have you tried going paperless in the field? Where do you stand on the open access debate? Are there any new innovations we missed that you think we should know about?
by Colleen Morgan
by W.B. Hafford
by Mitch Allen
by Stuart Eve
by Ronald Simkins and Nicolae Roddy
by William Caraher
by Eric Kansa[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog or found by following any link on this blog. 17勛圖will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information. 17勛圖will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. The opinions expressed by Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of 17勛圖or any employee thereof.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is the preeminent society for individuals interested in the archaeology of the eastern Mediterranean and the Biblical Lands. This blog is intended to facilitate ASOR���s泭mission泭���to initiate, encourage and support research into, and public understanding of, the cultures and history of the Near East from the earliest times.���[/vc_column_text][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]
Archaeology Weekly Roundup! 9-20-13
If you missed anything from the or pages this week, don���t worry. We���ve rounded up some of this week���s archaeology news into one convenient post. If we missed any major archaeological stories from this week, feel free to let us know in the comment section!
An archaeologists analysis on how the construction of megalithic monuments in Atlantic Europe are not restricted to a single purpose, nor how they reflect one aspect of the community that built them���
launched it���s new YouTube series ���Ask An Archaeologist.��� Real people submit their questions about archaeology and we have experienced archaeologists answer.
The Yorkshire Museum is hosting a special after-hours event this month that will give history fans a chance to interact and ���handle��� King Richard III���s treasures.
Teens playing in the river find human remains. Turns out to be the remains of a 1,000-year-old sub-Saharan African woman.
Biblical-era town of Dalmanutha (also spelled Dalmanoutha) may have been discovered on the northwest coast of the Sea of Galilee, in Israel���s Ginosar valley.
Students from Primary School have been actively taking part in an excavation at their school. Iron Age relics have been found at the site.
Remains of a pre-Inca pyramid destroyed by heavy machinery in Peru.
First-century mansion discovered in Jerusalem. Some say might have belonged to one of the priests who condemned Jesus to death.
Archaeologists find house of Roman garrison commander.
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][mk_divider thickness=”1″ margin_top=”10″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog or found by following any link on this blog. 17勛圖will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information. 17勛圖will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. The opinions expressed by Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of 17勛圖or any employee thereof.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]